Raising fees for international visitors may limit access for some tourists and impact gateway communities that depend on tourism. Additionally, there may be confusion or inequity in how “residency” is defined, particularly for U.S.-based immigrant or mixed-status families. While the fee increase may help fund critical improvements, it may not fully address the root problems highlighted by the National Parks Conservation Association, such as staffing shortages, closed visitor centers, and canceled tours, all of which affect the quality of visitor experiences regardless of nationality or citizenship status.
Executive Office of the President - White House Office
A directive issued by the President that manages operations of the federal government. Executive orders have the force of law but must align with existing statutes and constitutional authority.
Who It Impacts: Federal agencies and employees, directing them on how to implement laws or carry out government functions. Executive orders can also influence businesses and individuals when they relate to issues like immigration, trade, or labor policies.
Who Is Not Impacted: Private citizens and businesses do not have to directly follow an executive order unless it leads to regulations or policies that apply to them. For example, an executive order directing federal agencies to increase renewable energy use does not mandate action from private companies, but it may influence policy shifts that eventually affect them.
Date Enacted
July 3, 2025
Last Updated
August 13, 2025
Policy Type
Climate
Children and Families
Summary
This Executive Order increases entrance and recreation fees specifically for all foreign tourists (nonresidents). The additional revenue is intended to support expanded investments in park maintenance, staffing, and infrastructure upgrades - enhancing the overall visitor experience and preserving natural and cultural resources. The order also prioritizes American residents in reservation systems and permits lotteries at high-demand park sites.
Impact Analysis
Legal Challenges
No current legal challenges have been filed; however, future issues may arise over
- Definitions of “resident” vs. “non-resident” as it relates to park access
- Potential civil rights concerns tied to fee disparities or access limitations
Take Institutional Action
While this EO is not directly healthcare-related, it intersects with population health. Hospitals and health systems should advocate for access to national parks for all if they are serving large immigrant populations. Hospitals and healthcare organizations serving immigrant or refugee populations may wish to:
- Advocate for inclusive and clear definitions of residency;
- Support equitable access to nature-based wellness resources;
- Partner with community groups to restore educational and recreational access for underserved families.
Associated or Derivative Policies
- Great American Outdoors Act (Public Law 116-152): Enables funding through the National Parks and Public Land Legacy Restoration Fund
- Revokes the 2017 Presidential Memorandum on diversity and inclusion in public lands access (pending legal review)
Policy Prior to 2025
Previously, national parks operated under a unified fee structure regardless of nationality or immigration status. Public policy emphasized broad access, including outreach to underserved and international communities. However, due to recent staffing and funding cuts (see NPCA Report, March 2025), many parks have already reduced operations, closed visitor centers, and suspended educational programs, making equitable access harder even before this order.
.png)
